1. Our problem is We have described the whole process will not halt the development of extension of it? It is similar to a tree of gradual organic growth of it? Experience to give the answer is no. The fact is that economic system is not continuous and smooth forward movement. The majority of different types of reverse movement, deterioration, the appearance of events, blocking the path of development in the economic value of the system there are also interfere with the collapse of its collapse. Why? Here we encounter a new problem.
If the economic system for the development of the smooth lines of the high degree of very small, then they can hardly constitute a special request theorists pay attention to. In a growing economy, individuals may experience it a very serious matter of luck, and there is no theoretical reason why these phenomena in depth to go. Similarly, the destruction of the entire country39s economic development events, if rarely, if can be envisaged as an isolated misfortune, there would be no need of investigation and research in general. However, we are here to deal with the inverse and backward movement is regular, often the initial contact if the problem is bound to the cyclical nature of time will be displayed. If it is not logical to consider, then actually making the abstract for this phenomenon, carried out in any case is impossible.
Even worse, if that is the case, when a setback to be overcome, the earlier the development from being interrupted before it has reached the point to start, then the significance of this setback in principle is not a lot of the. Perhaps we can say that even if we can not explain the interference with the incident itself, or simply out of their abstract, we have to take into account all of these basic facts of the development. However, the situation is not so. Inverse is not only impede development, but also to enable the development to an end. The elimination of a large number of value economy leaders plan to be a fundamental condition and prerequisite for change. The economic system, in its re-development is required before re-marshal its value system also needs to reorganize. In addition, the development of a fresh start is a new process, not a simple continuation of the old process. Experience tells us that the real situation is that it more or less towards a direction similar to those earlier campaigns, but the plan was interrupted continuity. The development of new processes in different situations and different people, born in part of real estate operations many look forward to working with the old value was never buried, and completely new things appeared. From experience that may exist between the various types of setbacks in the development of all these local trunk, coincide with the general outline of the entire match, but in theory, we can not just consider the whole process of the contour lines. Entrepreneurs can not be frustrated over the stage and their plans intact into the next zone stage of development and science can not explain to do so, unless it is completely out of contact with the facts.
We must now study a class of this phenomenon, the phenomenon of this kind of phenomenon with other development it is very clear contrast, and with other development is clearly in a position of confrontation. The very beginning, there is the possibility of the following. chloe dior First, the crisis may or may not be a consistent phenomenon. We have learned from experience and the development of the crisis described as the process of the collapse of the special phenomenon, it seems that even the innocent are always the people but also as a phenomenon with a variety of forms. In spite of this, but this kind of identity crisis, really does not sustained. Instead, it mainly exists in the economy and personal impact on the similarity, and used to exist in some cases appear in the majority of occasions the fact that the crisis in. However, such influence and such an event, but dior the majority of economic life and all types of external and internal interference occur together, but not enough to prove that the crisis is always the same phenomenon. In fact, the crisis in different types and for different reasons can be identified. There is no reason for us in advance to make such an assumption, that is, the crisis between the same place as our starting point rather than an essential element, it is necessary to more, that is, the crisis is to make the process of economic development of the previous stop of the all events.
Second, whether the same or different phenomenon, the crisis may be, perhaps impossible, for purely economic explanation. Of course, there is no doubt that the crisis is in essence the economy. However, there is no master to conclude that they belong to the nature of the economy, or even necessarily in their real estate was born in their role of economic factors such the sense of belonging to any one system. In contrast, the real cause of the crisis is very likely exist in the scope of purely economic, in other words, give them the outside world crisis is the result of interference. The number of crises, and even the law often claimed that the crisis can not be the conclusion, as can easily be envisaged, such interference must always appear in real life. To put it simply, the crisis is the economic life of their own situation to adapt to the new process.
Taking into account the first point, we can begin talking about one thing. If we talk about the crisis in relation to any place in the face of large-scale disturbance, then the fact that apart from interfering with, the property does not exist in general. At present, it can be envisaged in the broad sense of the crisis. Economic process can be divided into different categories recycling flow process, the development process and impede the process of the latter without interruption process. This arrangement is not far away from reality. In real life, we can clearly separate the difference between these three phenomena. However, only a more detailed analysis in order to show that a class of them is attributed to the other two categories in the category.
There is no interference with the general characteristics of the crisis has been proved by history. These disturbances in the economic entity has every local outbreak can be envisaged, even in different places to break out in different ways. They sometimes appear on the supply side, and sometimes appear in the demand side the former occasions, and sometimes appear in the technical production, and sometimes appear in the market or credit relations In the latter occasion, and sometimes reflect the needs of the direction of change such as fashion changes, and sometimes reflect the changes in consumer purchasing power. For most of the various industrial christian dior groups, the disruption of different, but the first industry subject to more interference, and then another industry. Sometimes a crisis in order to have a special impact on the capitalists of the credit system is characterized by the collapse, and sometimes the workers or by the loss of the largest landowners. Entrepreneurs will also be a very different way to be involved in..
At first glance, in the form of performance up to seek out the common elements of the crisis, it seems more promising. In fact, it is this element of such a popular-oriented and scientific belief the crisis is always the same and is the same phenomenon. However, we easily see that these can be obtained from the external surface features, apart from being an interference with the development of elements of all the crisis, are neither common, nor is it essential. For example, panic Panic elements is a very obvious. It is early crisis crisis of the outstanding characteristics. However, there is no panic in a crisis. And further that there is no real panic crisis. The intensity of panic, in any case and the importance of the crisis, there is no necessary link. Finally, the panic is mostly the result of the crisis, rather than the reasons for it. This is such a speculative frenzy , overproduction and other slogans, they are applicable. Once the crisis erupted and changed the economic situation, then a lot of speculation is no sense, and the goods produced by almost every number seems too large, in spite of the crisis both before completely suited to the circumstances at the time . Similarly, the failure of individual firms, the production of the various departments of the link between the lack of appropriate production and consumption of inconsistency, as well as other elements such as these are the results, rather than reason. In this sense, there can be no criteria to determine satisfaction with the crisis, which can be seen from the following fact Despite the description of the subject in accordance with the literature, a certain number of crises must be replicable, but the addition, the content of each of the crisis details will no longer be met by each other.
Now we turn to another question whether all the crisis is not purely economic phenomena, that is, whether the formation of a crisis, as well as all the causes and results of their economic system can be adopted by the Institute for the interpretation of factors to be understood. It is clear that is not always the case, it may not necessarily bound to be the case. We can immediately recognize, for example, can cause the outbreak of war large enough to interfere with the formation of the crisis we are talking about. Of course, this is not the law. For example, the nineteenth century, most of the large-scale war sac dior did not immediately lead to a crisis. But that situation is not hard to imagine. We assume that an active trade with other countries and their economic system was conceived as a meaning in our island to achieve the full development of the country, an enemy fleet was cut off contact with the outside world. Imports and exports have been hampered the same price with the value system has been disrupted, the debt can not be maintained, credit pulled off the chain - all of which can be envisaged, in fact there have been, and indeed on behalf of a crisis. This crisis can not simply be explained economically, because the reasons for war are elements outside the economic system. Within the framework of the economic role of such external entities, arising out of crisis and at the same time be explained. Repeated these external factors to explain the crisis. An important example is the bad harvest, it is clear that the harvest would cause a crisis, and as we all know, has become a crisis or even the basis of theory.
However, even if weather conditions such as war or as a significant external role in the economic system of the various environmental, must also be from a purely theoretical point of view the reasons as a result of external interference, which in principle is seen as accidental. For example, the abolition of protective tariffs may also be caused by a sudden crisis. This measure is of course a business is an economic event. But we can not precisely determine the appearance of it, we may examine only the results of it. The law of economic life from the point of view, it is basically a kind of influence from the outside world. This is not the existence of the so-called phenomenon of pure economic crisis. It is precisely because they are not purely economic phenomenon of the crisis, so we can not be purely economic point of view they are generally talking about the reasons. For us, they will be regarded as unfortunate accident.
Now the problem whether there are any we are talking about pure economic crisis? Whether there are not we just talking about the outside world, for example to stimulate the emergence of crisis? In fact, this view is understandable, and in fact has been confirmed the crisis is always the result of the external environment. However, there is no doubt that it is a very specious. If it is correct, then there is no real crisis on the economic theory, and we will do nothing but simply to confirm these facts, or, at best, those who attempted to external causes of the crisis, to be classified.
In response to our questions, we must rid ourselves of a special kind of crisis. If a country39s industries by providing financial assistance to another country, if the impact of the latter wave of prosperity, while the latter than the former to provide a more favorable capital purposes, then there is a recovery of investment from the previous trend of capital . If this incident very quickly and lightly taken place, then it obviously has the benefit of countries in the previous crisis. This case should show that an economic region can be caused by purely economic reasons for the crisis in another region. This phenomenon is repeated and widely recognized. Obviously, this can not only occurred in two different countries, but also can occur in different parts of a country between, and in certain circumstances, can also occur in an economic region between different industrial sectors. Once when the crisis broke out in one place, it usually involves other parts. The problem now is that this phenomenon is purely economic, is that we are looking for a right? The answer is no. Economic conditions in other parts of the economy in any given material data and in the interpretation of the phenomenon of the system, the only non-economic factors can serve as a role. For study of the economic system, which are occasional and, if such a crisis in an attempt to find a universal law, it would be futile.
Finally, in abandoned all external causes of the crisis, we also found a purely economic nature are other reasons, which means that the cause of the economic system, but nevertheless, they failed to show a new theory. Per a new union, with our old saying that has lead to the obvious danger of failure. Although all sectors of industry make a very few fatal errors, but they still occur, and, if there are problems with the enterprises of the importance of adequate, then the crisis in the majority of symptoms can be caused by them. However, having said that, this type of incident is only a small disaster, can be explained in each individual co-operation but the nature of economic processes as a factor or factors the results of this sense, they are not inherent in the economic process.
If we take into account a series of such interference may be the reason, then, when we abstract all projects, whether it is what is left is doubtful and, except to say so, if as a result of the accidental external or internal events the result of any matter of sufficient importance to go wrong, the crisis just happened, then the causal relationship on the crisis, we can not say anything more. History is not in contradiction with this theory. Because almost every occasion there is a lot of historical accident, the accident could be considered responsible for the actual crisis, and there is no obvious paradox of the absurd, so that anyone seeking a more universal and necessary root cause , and not like some of us believe as obvious. Incidentally, it should be noted that, although we may decide this issue, but the majority of large-scale crisis in the history of the individual background, for every occasion to explain the observed what is actually happening, rather than into the general theory of anything more important - the assumption that this theory is possible - and therefore this theory is not only as the actual situation of any kind of diagnosis or the principle of a contribution remedy, we can no longer get from it more . If businesses are almost always tried to hand to explain the special circumstances of the crisis, they are not wrong. Empiricist for lack of trying to establish a general theory based on the confrontation, nor are wrong - even though it is not required for such an occasion of confrontation, but only on two completely different tasks, a clear distinction.
This decisive discovery, the solution to our problems and at the same time, our discussion shifted to a slightly different position of the discovery, establish the following facts In any case the existence of a class of crisis, they are the overlap period of prosperity and recession of the wave elements of exercise, or regular in any case, even if the incident may not be necessary, and elements in this category since the beginning of the capitalist era the infiltration of economic life. This phenomenon arises from a large number and wide variety of different facts, they can be used to explain the situation of frustration and collapse. Mutation in the economic life of the great is what we must first explain. Once we grasp this issue, to the purpose of theoretical analysis, we not only have reason to assume that does not exist and was forced to assume that all other bills from the industrial life to the external and internal interference, in order to facilitate the separation from a theoretical point of view of The only meaningful question. Although to do so, but we should never forget that we have to abandon those things not because they At the same time, our theory, if the limit we are discussing the narrow scope of the problem, then certainly with all the broader analysis of the scope of the efforts are not commensurate, and this effort is designed to fully understand the reality of things in the process of providing a tool.